After you subscribe, whenever a new article appears on
“Gizmodo”
the new content will be emailed to you (see preview below) from <rss@rssforward.net>.
Your email will never be disclosed to a third party, or to the publisher of the feed. Honest!
Sites are polled for updates approximately every hour (6-12 hours for torrent sites)
This is what the emails will look like:
The following preview may be cached. Its purpose here is to confirm proper
formatting and should not be considered as fresh content. RSS:Forward is not affiliated
with the authors of the following entries nor responsible for their content.
From:
Gizmodo
<rss@rssforward.net>
Subject: Our Favorite Lifehacker Posts of the Week [Roundups]
[1]Once again, the dudes at Lifehacker show us how to be anal and get things done. Here are our favorite posts of the week.
• [2]Use Safari to update your iPhone's word database with curse words 100% of the time
• [3]NiceCritic lets you tell people things anonymously - "Dear Adam Pash, you smell weird. Signed, Anonymous Gizmodo Editor"
• [4]Women multitask with TV and internet twice as much as men? What? This doesn't sound right.
• [5]Use Your Playstation Portable as an Additional Windows Monitor
• [6]Five Best Portable Applications - For when your internet is down and you have to work at the library like a hobo or that blogging prostitute
• [7]Browse the iTunes store without iTunes
• [8]Make simple wall mounts for your speakers, because you're a cheap person
• [9]Get freeware versions of paid apps, once again, because you're a cheap person
• [10]Get food under $10, again because...
• [11]Make your own windshield de-icer
• [12]Deep Inside Windows 7 with Tech Guru Mark Russinovich - Sounds like the title of the worst adult film ever
• [13]Windows 7 Shortcuts Enables the Best Win7 Shortcuts in XP or Vista - Who doesn't like shortcuts
• [14]Eversave saves your open documents regularly
• [15]Gizmo Drive mounts a bunch of drive types, including Windows 7's VHD
• [16]Get cheap exercise equipment when people move - Jeez those Lifehackerers are cheap
[17][18] [19]
[20] [21] [22] [23] [24]
___
Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/0znJMlrJuSA/our-favorite-lifehacker-posts-of-the-week
[1] <http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/homepage.png>
[2] <http://lifehacker.com/5134799/safari-the-only-sure+fire-way-to-update-iphones-auto+correct-database>
[3] <http://lifehacker.com/5134177/nicecritic-sends-awkward-messages-anonymously>
[4] <http://lifehacker.com/5134387/study-claims-women-multitask-tvinternet-twice-as-much-as-men>
[5] <http://lifehacker.com/5131705>
[6] <http://lifehacker.com/5133679>
[7] <http://lifehacker.com/5136148/app-store-browses-the-itunes-store-without-itunes>
[8] <http://lifehacker.com/5129985>
[9] <http://lifehacker.com/5135191>
[10] <http://lifehacker.com/5135233>
[11] <http://lifehacker.com/5129993/>
[12] <http://lifehacker.com/5133359>
[13] <http://lifehacker.com/5133039>
[14] <http://lifehacker.com/5135504/eversave-automatically-saves-your-work-on-a-regular-interval>
[15] <http://lifehacker.com/5134980/gizmo-drive-mounts-iso-bin-and-vhd-disk-images>
[16] <http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/lifehacker/full/~3/HffWBof4AbQ/find-cheaper-exercise-equipment-through-move+out-sales>
[17] <http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=7a677e7a5430c792f95ccf894382e3c0&p=1>
[18] <http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=7a677e7a5430c792f95ccf894382e3c0&p=1>
[19] <http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=7a677e7a5430c792f95ccf894382e3c0>
[20] <http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=z0uxunFH>
[21] <http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=rtuBr8pZ>
[22] <http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=iVJNkwiJ>
[23] <http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=XXYURR2a>
[24] <http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~4/0znJMlrJuSA>
From:
Gizmodo
<rss@rssforward.net>
Subject: Minutuner Clock Helps You Visualize Time and Disguises Itself as a Radio [Clocks]
[1]Why are traditional clocks round? Perhaps to symbolize the Circle of Life and how time's constantly repeating itself? The Minutuner Clock concept wants you to visualize time for what it is: Progressively moving forward.
The hour is displayed on the left with the ticker moving away from it as the minutes go on. Although this clock was also designed to look like an old radio tuner, it doesn't actually function as one. This sucks—at least let me enjoy some booty-shaking music as I depressingly watch my life tick by! [[2]Yanko via [3]DVice]
[4][5] [6]
[7] [8] [9] [10] [11]
___
Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/j2FYmgb5WDk/minutuner-clock-helps-you-visualize-time-and-disguises-itself-as-a-radio
[1] <http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/tunerclock.jpg>
[2] <http://www.yankodesign.com/2009/01/21/my-alarm-clock-is-not-a-movie-or-maybe/>
[3] <http://dvice.com/archives/2009/01/time_tuner_cloc.php>
[4] <http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=39d267e9481784154e7a05b00fb101da&p=1>
[5] <http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=39d267e9481784154e7a05b00fb101da&p=1>
[6] <http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=39d267e9481784154e7a05b00fb101da>
[7] <http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=8C65LzGv>
[8] <http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=tGwa27ut>
[9] <http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=KBBp0ZZN>
[10] <http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=d4JgFUZi>
[11] <http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~4/j2FYmgb5WDk>
Why are traditional clocks round? Perhaps to symbolize the Circle of Life and how time's constantly repeating itself? The Minutuner Clock concept wants you to visualize time for what it is: Progressively moving forward.
The hour is displayed on the left with the ticker moving away from it as the minutes go on. Although this clock was also designed to look like an old radio tuner, it doesn't actually function as one. This sucks—at least let me enjoy some booty-shaking music as I depressingly watch my life tick by! [Yanko via DVice]
Source:
http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/j2FYmgb5WDk/minutuner-clock-helps-you-visualize-time-and-disguises-itself-as-a-radio
From:
Gizmodo
<rss@rssforward.net>
Subject: Why Obama Doesn't Use a Cordless Phone (And Neither Should You) [Cordless Phones]
[1]I hate cordless phones. So when Gizmodo reader ournextcontestant asked why Obama was using a corded phone instead of a cordless phone in [2]this photo, I felt it was our duty to explain.
First off, yeah, we're aware that the main point of being cordless is that you can take the phone with you around the house. That's one point in its "positive" column. Here are the negatives, in no particular order.
• Security. The president needs to make sure some bozo out on the lawn can eavesdrop on his phone call with a baby monitor.
• Interference. "Hold on Putin, the kids are microwaving some popcorn."
• Sound quality. Being able to actually hear inflections in people's voices is kinda important when dealing with international crises.
• You have to charge it. Aides can probably do it for him, but it's a pain.
• It's easy to lose
• It requires power. If the White House ever completely loses power (including whatever generators they might have), he wouldn't be able to make any calls from his desk.
• Corded phones have more features. The most gadgety reason is that that current phone, which is probably by Cisco or Avaya or someone similar, and has tons and tons of features. There's probably even an Optimus Prime voice changer on that thing. No way will a cordless phone be able to match that.
To be honest, I had to check my calendar when writing this post, since this whole topic of cordless vs. corded feels like I'm back in 1993. You kids and your beepers! And your V-Chips! And your closed captionings! [[3]NYT]
[4][5] [6]
[7] [8] [9] [10] [11]
___
Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/85B0YECAjco/why-obama-doesnt-use-a-cordless-phone-and-neither-should-you
[1] <http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/01/obamaphone_02.jpg>
[2] <http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/22/us/politics/22obamacnd.html?hp>
[3] <http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/22/us/politics/22obamacnd.html?hp>
[4] <http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=ce89d27fc520096611c84da4fcd6e2af&p=1>
[5] <http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=ce89d27fc520096611c84da4fcd6e2af&p=1>
[6] <http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=ce89d27fc520096611c84da4fcd6e2af>
[7] <http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=e5cXYo2V>
[8] <http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=RTBut6pi>
[9] <http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=aG0Aow6f>
[10] <http://feeds.gawker.com/~f/gizmodo/full?a=XdaYS8WQ>
[11] <http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~4/85B0YECAjco>
I hate cordless phones. So when Gizmodo reader ournextcontestant asked why Obama was using a corded phone instead of a cordless phone in this photo, I felt it was our duty to explain.
First off, yeah, we're aware that the main point of being cordless is that you can take the phone with you around the house. That's one point in its "positive" column. Here are the negatives, in no particular order.
• Security. The president needs to make sure some bozo out on the lawn can eavesdrop on his phone call with a baby monitor.
• Interference. "Hold on Putin, the kids are microwaving some popcorn."
• Sound quality. Being able to actually hear inflections in people's voices is kinda important when dealing with international crises.
• You have to charge it. Aides can probably do it for him, but it's a pain.
• It's easy to lose
• It requires power. If the White House ever completely loses power (including whatever generators they might have), he wouldn't be able to make any calls from his desk.
• Corded phones have more features. The most gadgety reason is that that current phone, which is probably by Cisco or Avaya or someone similar, and has tons and tons of features. There's probably even an Optimus Prime voice changer on that thing. No way will a cordless phone be able to match that.
To be honest, I had to check my calendar when writing this post, since this whole topic of cordless vs. corded feels like I'm back in 1993. You kids and your beepers! And your V-Chips! And your closed captionings! [NYT]
Source:
http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/85B0YECAjco/why-obama-doesnt-use-a-cordless-phone-and-neither-should-you
Once again, the dudes at Lifehacker show us how to be anal and get things done. Here are our favorite posts of the week.